Garret Murai | California Construction Law Blog We’ve written before about the Privette doctrine, which establishes a presumption that a hirer of an independent contractor delegates to the contractor all responsibility for workplace safety. In other words, if a general contractor hires a subcontractor, the subcontractor is solely responsible for the safety of its workers.… Continue reading Just Because You Caused it, Doesn’t Mean You Own It: The Hooker Exception to the Privette Doctrine
Month: March 2023
Insurer’s Appeal of Jury Verdict Rejected by Tenth Circuit
Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii After a jury awarded damages related to the insurer’s delayed payment under the claim and the insurer’s post trial motions to set aside the verdict were denied, the Tenth Circuit affirmed. US General, LLC v. GuideOne Mut. Ins. Co., 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 34066 (10th Cir. Dec.… Continue reading Insurer’s Appeal of Jury Verdict Rejected by Tenth Circuit
Construction Contract’s Scope of Work Should be Written with Clarity
David Adelstein | Florida Construction Legal Updates The scope of work section in your construction contract should never be overlooked. In numerous instances, it is overlooked which leads to a dispute as to the precise nature of the scope of work. This dispute could be the result of an ambiguity in the scope of work section. Or… Continue reading Construction Contract’s Scope of Work Should be Written with Clarity
Oregon Ruling Calls Into Question Quantum Meruit Claims in Construction Cases
Matthew Mues | Davis Wright Tremaine On February 15, 2023, the Oregon Court of Appeals ruled that an excavation subcontractor, plaintiff Kizer Excavating Co., (“Kizer”) could not maintain a quantum meruit claim against a general contractor, defendant Stout Building Contractors, LLC, (“Stout”) for work performed by Kizer beyond that contemplated in Kizer’s proposal, which was incorporated into… Continue reading Oregon Ruling Calls Into Question Quantum Meruit Claims in Construction Cases
California Appeals Court Says No Duty to Defend Where Policy Exclusion Applies
Alex Purvis, Emily M. Ruzic and Amandeep S. Kahlon | Build Smart In Ali Heidari v. Golden Bear Insurance, a California appeals court recently affirmed a lower court’s decision to deny relief under a CGL policy, where the policy excluded from coverage work performed by subcontractors under the contractor’s warranty exclusion. Specifically, the appellate court upheld the trial… Continue reading California Appeals Court Says No Duty to Defend Where Policy Exclusion Applies