Duty to Defend Pre-Litigation Construction Defect Claims

Christopher P. Ferragamo and Alexis P. Joachim | DRI Coverage disputes between insureds and their insurance companies over the scope of  the term “suit” and whether insurers are obligated to provide insureds with a defense for quasi-judicial proceedings relating primarily to environmental clean-up actions initiated by state and federal environmental agencies have been waged for decades. The Insurance Services Office (ISO) attempted to end… Continue reading Duty to Defend Pre-Litigation Construction Defect Claims

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend is Now Triggered by Pre-Suit Notices Under Florida’s Construction Defect Statute, But Only With an Insurer’s Consent

Gary Brown and Steven Appelbaum | Construction Industry Counselor | January 5, 2018 In a case of first impression that will undoubtedly have significant effects on Florida’s construction and insurance industries, the Florida Supreme Court recently decided that an insurer’s duty to defend under a standard form commercial general liability (CGL) policy was triggered by… Continue reading An Insurer’s Duty to Defend is Now Triggered by Pre-Suit Notices Under Florida’s Construction Defect Statute, But Only With an Insurer’s Consent

Oregon Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Nature of the Duty to Defend, even in the Face of Ambiguous or Unclear Allegations

Kevin Mapes | The Policyholder Report | December 14, 2016 Back in August 2015, I wrote this post about the Oregon Court of Appeals opinion in West Hills Development Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc., where the court confirmed that Oregon’s broad duty to defend extended to parties claiming rights as “additional insureds.” Last week, the… Continue reading Oregon Supreme Court Reaffirms Broad Nature of the Duty to Defend, even in the Face of Ambiguous or Unclear Allegations

Contract Indemnity and Duty to Defend vs. Insurance Duty to Defend

Stan Martin | Commonsense Construction Law LLC | June 10, 2016 A New Hampshire court has issued a thoughtful decision on the duty to defend arising from an indemnity obligation in a design contract. The court distinguished between the duty to defend often invoked for insurance coverage, from a duty to defend expressed in a… Continue reading Contract Indemnity and Duty to Defend vs. Insurance Duty to Defend

Construction Defect Notice Under Right to Repair Statute

Advise & Consult, Inc. | September 9, 2015 Construction defect notices under Chapter 558 of the Florida “notice and repair’ statute, “does not constitute a ‘civil proceeding’” and thus “is not a ‘suit’” triggering an insurer’s duty to defend as ruled on in Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co., No. 13–80831–CIV, 2015… Continue reading Construction Defect Notice Under Right to Repair Statute

%d bloggers like this: