Expert Testimony by Engineer Needed to Prove Construction/Design Defect Claim, Utah Court of Appeals Rules

Carl G. Roberts and Matthew L. Moncur – December 5, 2011 The Utah Court of Appeals has ruled that expert testimony from a civil engineer was needed to establish two essential elements—breach of duty and causation—in a negligence case alleging an injury caused by a defect in design or construction. The November 25, 2011, decision… Continue reading Expert Testimony by Engineer Needed to Prove Construction/Design Defect Claim, Utah Court of Appeals Rules

The Four-Step Cross-Examination

IMS ExpertServices – December 6, 2011 There are numerous stages in the litigation process that are time-intensive, uncertain and stressful.  However, if your deposition was done properly, cross-examining an expert witness is not one of those elements.  While this will be a review for many, following these simple suggestions will ensure that your cross-examination is… Continue reading The Four-Step Cross-Examination

An Expert Witness Is Above All, Objective

The credibility of an expert witness’ testimony is largely based on their ability to have an objective opinion. Objective: not influenced by personal feelings, interpretations, or prejudice; based on facts; unbiased: an objective opinion. In representing a client on a construction defect claim, I am often faced with an opposing party who submits an “expert… Continue reading An Expert Witness Is Above All, Objective

%d bloggers like this: