Matthew T. Vocci – April 30, 2014 The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion this month that should serve as a reminder to prime contractors to review the coverage granted to them as additional insureds on their subcontractors’ Commercial General Liability (“CGL”) policies. In Carl E. Woodward, L.L.C. v. Acceptance… Continue reading Think You are Covered by an Additional Insured Endorsement? Recent Opinion Serves as a Reminder to Read the Coverage Language
Category: General Liability Policy
Ewings are Making a Name for Themselves in Texas, Again
David L. Beck – January 23, 2014 The recent decision by the Texas Supreme Court in Ewing Constr. Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., No. 12-0661, 2014 WL 185035 (Tex. Jan. 17, 2014), has insureds in Texas and throughout the country breathing a sigh of relief. The decision confirms the limited scope of the Texas… Continue reading Ewings are Making a Name for Themselves in Texas, Again
Draft Your Lawsuit to Trigger Insurance Coverage
Anthony Osborn – October 23, 2013 As most people reading this blog post are aware, construction lawsuits can trigger seemingly countless insurance coverage issues. For example, were the alleged damages caused by an “occurrence” as defined in the contractor’s insurance policy? If so, did the damages begin and/or end during different years, thereby triggering multiple… Continue reading Draft Your Lawsuit to Trigger Insurance Coverage
Overlooked Obtaining an Additional Insured Endorsement? You Might be Saved by the Automatic Additional Insured Endorsement – or Might Not.
Richard Dyer – October 18, 2013 Many CGL policies typically include an endorsement that contains a clause providing for automatic additional insured status without a project specific schedule listing names of additional insureds. (See, for example, form CG 2033 0704, “Additional Insured-Owners, Lessees or Contractors – Automatic Status When Required in Construction Agreement With You”). … Continue reading Overlooked Obtaining an Additional Insured Endorsement? You Might be Saved by the Automatic Additional Insured Endorsement – or Might Not.
New Insurance Case – S.C. Supreme Court: Defective Construction Work Satisfies “Caused by an Occurrence” Requirement in CGL Policy
Scott Turner – September 28, 2013 On Monday, Sept. 25th , the Supreme Court of South Carolina issued its decision in Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Rhodes, — S.E.2d —-, 2013 WL 5348381 (2013). It held that the “occurrence” of a collapse of the policyholder’s construction work in one location satisfies the causation part of the… Continue reading New Insurance Case – S.C. Supreme Court: Defective Construction Work Satisfies “Caused by an Occurrence” Requirement in CGL Policy