Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii The insurer’s motion for partial summary judgment challenging the insured’s bad faith claim was successful. Baker v. Allstate Index. Co., 2024 U,.S. Dist. LEXIS 227802 (N.D. Miss. Dec. 17, 2024). Teresa Baker alleged that the roof of her rental property sustained wind and rain damage during… Continue reading Insured’s Count for Bad Faith Stripped from Claim
Category: Insurance Coverage
Conditions to Coverage May Be More Conditional Than You Thought
Max J. Louik and Alexa L. Austin | The Policyholder Perspective Conditions Precedent to Coverage Insurance policies typically are subject to certain conditions precedent to coverage. As the name suggests, conditions precedent to coverage are obligations placed on the insured that, in the normal case, must be complied with in order for coverage to attach. Take… Continue reading Conditions to Coverage May Be More Conditional Than You Thought
Jackson v. Spinnaker: Court Rules a Thorough Investigation is Just Good Business, Not Bad Faith
Ashley Eldridge | Property Insurance Law Observer In Jackson v. Spinnaker Insurance Company, the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania considered a homeowners insurance coverage dispute, ultimately finding that questions of residency and alleged fraudulent misrepresentations precluded summary judgment. However, the court granted summary judgment in favor of the insurer on the… Continue reading Jackson v. Spinnaker: Court Rules a Thorough Investigation is Just Good Business, Not Bad Faith
Where There’s Smoke, Is There Coverage? A Closer Look at Bottega, LLC v. National Surety and Gharibian v. Wawanesa
Rachel E. Hudgins and Scott P. DeVries | Hunton Insurance Recovery Blog For policyholders, insurance is meant to provide peace of mind—a promise that when disaster strikes, they’ll have financial support to rebuild and recover. But as two recent cases show, the question of what qualifies as covered “direct physical loss or damage” can lead… Continue reading Where There’s Smoke, Is There Coverage? A Closer Look at Bottega, LLC v. National Surety and Gharibian v. Wawanesa
Understanding Insurance Disputes in Construction Defect Litigation: A Review of Acuity v. Kinsale
David McLain | Higgins, Hopkins, McLain & Roswell Construction projects are inherently complex, and insurance coverage plays a crucial role in managing risks, especially when unforeseen issues arise. The case of Acuity v. Kinsale demonstrates the tangled web of insurance obligations, especially when multiple insurers provide coverage for a single event. This case, involving Monarch Stucco, Inc.,… Continue reading Understanding Insurance Disputes in Construction Defect Litigation: A Review of Acuity v. Kinsale