Trading in the Handshake for a Well-Written Contract

Jodie Clark McDougal – August 26, 2013 In thinking about the article I would write for the September issue of Blueprint, my thoughts quickly turned to September’s Tour of Remodeled Homes and all of the great remodelers in the HBA. One construction law topic that I often speak about to remodelers is the benefits of having a well-written… Continue reading Trading in the Handshake for a Well-Written Contract

Builders in California May Further Limit the Statute of Limitations

Darren Johnson – July 19, 2013 The California Court of Appeal has upheld a provision in a construction contract by which the builder effectively shaved six years off the limitations period in which the owner could bring a construction defect lawsuit. In Brisbane Lodging L.P. v. Webcor Builders, Inc., 2013 DJDAR 7127 (June 3, 2013),… Continue reading Builders in California May Further Limit the Statute of Limitations

Standard AIA Contract Language May Waive “Discovery Rule”

Scott D. Cahalan and Darren G. Rowles – June 14, 2013 In a recent decision styled Brisbane Lodging, L.P. v. Webcor Builders, Inc., the California Court of Appeals found that a contract clause providing that all causes of action relating to the contract work would accrue from the date of substantial completion of the project… Continue reading Standard AIA Contract Language May Waive “Discovery Rule”

Utah’s Anti-Indemnification Statute and Additional Insured Provisions

Jeremy Stewart – June 22, 2013 In Utah, an agreement to indemnify in a construction contract is governed by Utah’s anti-indemnification statute, Utah Code Ann. § 13-8-1. Utah’s anti-indemnification statute defines an “indemnification provision” as an agreement between any combination of construction managers, general contractors, subcontractors, sub-subcontractors or suppliers (collectively, “construction workers”) “requiring the promisor… Continue reading Utah’s Anti-Indemnification Statute and Additional Insured Provisions

New Mexico’s Anti-Indemnity Act and Additional Insured Provisions

Joshua Grabel – June 21, 2013 The New Mexico Anti-Indemnity Act related to construction projects was adopted to “promote safety in uniquely hazardous work place environments,” like construction sites, by holding each party accountable for its actions on a construction site. See N.M.S.A. § 56-7-1 (“the Act”). The Act reads, in pertinent part: A provision in… Continue reading New Mexico’s Anti-Indemnity Act and Additional Insured Provisions

%d bloggers like this: