Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii The Eleventh Circuit vacated the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the insurer finding there was no duty to defend. Southern-Owners Ins. Co. v. Mac Contractors of Florida, LLC, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 23918 (11th Cir. July 29, 2020). Mac Contractors entered into a… Continue reading Eleventh Circuit Vacates District Court Decision Finding No Duty to Defend Faulty Workmanship Claims
Tag: duty to defend
Insurer that Breached Duty to Defend Bears Burden on Allocation of Defense Costs
William Knauss, III | Wiley Rein Applying Arizona law, the United States District Court for the District of Arizona held that an insurer that breached its duty to defend bears the burden of demonstrating that an allocation of defense costs between covered and non-covered claims is possible. Tapestry on Cent. Condo. Ass’n. v. Liberty Ins. Underwriters… Continue reading Insurer that Breached Duty to Defend Bears Burden on Allocation of Defense Costs
Carrier Has Duty to Defend Claim for Active Malfunction of Product
Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii Rejecting that the underlying claim was based solely on faulty workmanship, the Third Circuit held the insurer had a duty to defend allegations of a malfunctioning product. Nautilus Ins. Co. v. 200 Christina Street Partners LLC, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 22118 (3d Cir. July 16, 2020). … Continue reading Carrier Has Duty to Defend Claim for Active Malfunction of Product
Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Duty to Defend When Case Law is Uncertain
Eric B. Hermanson and Austin D. Moody | White and Williams The Connecticut Supreme Court recently addressed whether an insurer has a duty to defend when faced with legal uncertainty as to whether coverage is owed: for example, when there is no Connecticut case law on point, and courts outside of the state have reached… Continue reading Connecticut Supreme Court Finds Duty to Defend When Case Law is Uncertain
The No Corners Rule? New York Federal Court Holds No Duty to Defend Where There Is No Possible Legal or Factual Basis for Indemnification of Insured
Chael Clark | PropertyCasualtyFocus Under New York law, an insurer’s duty to defend ends if it establishes as a matter of law that there is no possible factual or legal basis on which it might eventually be obligated to indemnify its insured. This rule was recently applied by the Southern District of New York in Philadelphia… Continue reading The No Corners Rule? New York Federal Court Holds No Duty to Defend Where There Is No Possible Legal or Factual Basis for Indemnification of Insured