Oregon’s Broad Duty to Defend Extends to “Additional Insureds”

Kevin Mapes | Ball Janik | August 19, 2015 On August 19, 2015, the Oregon Court of Appeals issued its opinion in West Hills Development Co. v. Chartis Claims, Inc., reaffirming the broad nature of an insurer’s duty to defend, even when that duty is owed to an “additional insured.” Contracting parties rely on indemnity… Continue reading Oregon’s Broad Duty to Defend Extends to “Additional Insureds”

California Court Confirms that any “Potentially Covered” Loss Triggers the Duty to Defend

Gabe Weaver | Ball Janik | August 10, 2015 When threatened with a lawsuit, an insured’s first call is often to his or her insurer, asking the insurer to hire lawyers to defend the lawsuit. All too often the insurer’s initial response is that the claim is not covered for one reason or another. At… Continue reading California Court Confirms that any “Potentially Covered” Loss Triggers the Duty to Defend

Construction Defect Notice Under Right to Repair Statute

Advise & Consult, Inc. | September 9, 2015 Construction defect notices under Chapter 558 of the Florida “notice and repair’ statute, “does not constitute a ‘civil proceeding’” and thus “is not a ‘suit’” triggering an insurer’s duty to defend as ruled on in Altman Contractors, Inc. v. Crum & Forster Specialty Ins. Co., No. 13–80831–CIV, 2015… Continue reading Construction Defect Notice Under Right to Repair Statute

Duty To Defend Construction Defect Case Affirmed, Duty to Indemnify Reversed In Part

Tred R. Eyerly | Insurance Law Hawaii | May 4, 2015 The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s finding of a duty to defend, but reversed, in part, the insurer’s duty to indemnify. Carithers v. Mid-Continent Cas. Co., 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 5540 (11th Cir. April 7, 2015). After discovering a number of defects in their… Continue reading Duty To Defend Construction Defect Case Affirmed, Duty to Indemnify Reversed In Part

Insurer’s Duty to Defend: When is it Triggered? When is it Not?

Zach McLeroy | Colorado Construction Litigation | Feburary 9, 2015 In Colorado it is well recognized that an insurer has a broad duty to defend its policyholder against pending claims.  An insurer’s duty to defend is triggered when the underlying complaint against the insured alleges any set of facts that might fall within the coverage policy.… Continue reading Insurer’s Duty to Defend: When is it Triggered? When is it Not?

%d bloggers like this: