Expert Testimony by Engineer Needed to Prove Construction/Design Defect Claim, Utah Court of Appeals Rules

Carl G. Roberts and Matthew L. Moncur – December 5, 2011 The Utah Court of Appeals has ruled that expert testimony from a civil engineer was needed to establish two essential elements—breach of duty and causation—in a negligence case alleging an injury caused by a defect in design or construction. The November 25, 2011, decision… Continue reading Expert Testimony by Engineer Needed to Prove Construction/Design Defect Claim, Utah Court of Appeals Rules

%d bloggers like this: