Can Active Interference By Owner Invalidate A No Damages For Delay Clause? Sometimes.

Matthew DeVries | Best Practices Construction Law | April 12, 2016 Some will say that a “no damages for delay” clause is harsh.  Well, it depends on which hat you wear. If you are a contractor, you have a reasonable expectation that you will be paid for the extra work to overcome a delay beyond… Continue reading Can Active Interference By Owner Invalidate A No Damages For Delay Clause? Sometimes.

Limitations of Liability— Scenario Two: No Damages for Delays Clauses

Gregory Faulkner | Robinson Cole | November 10, 2015 Owners often attempt to limit their liability to contractors through what is commonly known in the construction industry as a “no damages for delays” clause.  Much like waivers of consequential damages, a “no damages for delays” clause, which limits damages for construction delays, accelerations and other… Continue reading Limitations of Liability— Scenario Two: No Damages for Delays Clauses

%d bloggers like this: