Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail” Required By California’s Civil Code – Blanchette v. Superior Court (2017) 8 Cal.App.5th 521

Richard H. Glucksman and David A. Napper | Chapman Glucksman | May 25, 2017 On February 10, 2017, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal held that if a builder fails to acknowledge receipt of a homeowner’s Notice of Claim within 14 days, as required by the Right to Repair Act (“SB800”), specifically California Civil Code §913, the… Continue reading Builder Must Respond To Homeowner’s Notice Of Claim Within 14 Days Even If Construction Defect Claim Is Not Alleged With The “Reasonable Detail” Required By California’s Civil Code – Blanchette v. Superior Court (2017) 8 Cal.App.5th 521

Recent Developments in the Interpretation of California’s Right to Repair Act

Kevin Meade, Esq. and Scott Halberstadt, Esq. | The Amin Law Group | April 10, 2017 While we await the California Supreme Court’s opinion in the matter of McMillin Albany, LLC v. Superior Court, 239 Cal.App.4th 1132 (2015) (hereinafter “McMillin”)[1], we have received additional guidance regarding the application and interpretation of California’s Right to Repair… Continue reading Recent Developments in the Interpretation of California’s Right to Repair Act

%d bloggers like this: